The Relevance of the Irrelevant
Parashat Pekudei
Rabbi Esther
Hugenholtz
The Relevance of
the Irrelevant
Caught somewhere between the slavery narrative of the
Book of Exodus and the wilderness stories of the Book of Numbers, lies the vast
expanse (dare I say ‘wasteland’) of technical details of Leviticus. The construction of the Tabernacle, the
detailing of the Priestly garments, the instructions on how to perform the
sacrificial cult and – to top it all of with – the purity laws regulating
conduct around bodily fluids, secretions, corpses, insects and weird types of
house mold: great fun!
Usually, when we are presented with such difficult, grating
or dull texts, we have a few hermeneutical options—that is, ways to interpret
said texts so that we can make sense of them.
Our first option would be to ignore the text. We’re just
not going to talk about all that icky, boring, irrelevant stuff. However, this
is neither intellectually nor spiritually satisfying. We can’t just ignore
whole swaths of our tradition just because we don’t like it!
Our second option is to engage in apologetics. In other
words, we try to justify the text: maybe the temple, sacrifices and purity laws
were a good thing? Maybe people need rules to abide by. Perhaps we just have to
accept Divine wisdom and go with it?
Well, to be honest, this might be an even less enticing
option than option #1. Just like we cannot ignore the tradition, we cannot
ignore our critical thinking skills or the demands of contemporary life.
So our third options is to look at the bigger picture. In
Pekudei, both the Parashah and the Haftarah deal with the minutiae of the
Temple cult. In the Torah portion, we look at the collection of funds, the
creation of the tabernacle implements and the garments of the priesthood. The
Haftarah, which is from First Kings, chapters 7 and 8 is the perfect parallel
text to the portion. Where it is Betzalel and Oholiab who oversee the work on
the Mishkan in the Torah, it is Hiram, the son of a Naphtalite woman and Tyrian
man (a mixed marriage of sorts) who oversees the work on the Beit Mikdash, the
Temple. Like Betzalel a few parshiyot ago, Hiram is also described as ‘veyimale et hachochmah v’et hat’vunah v’et
hada’at’ – ‘he was filled with wisdom, with insight and with knowledge’ (1
Kings 7:14). You might remember that a few weeks ago, I gave a sermon at how we
can view those particular qualities in our own lives. Then the Biblical text
slips into a detailed account of the building of the Temple until, strikingly,
just like the parashah, we read about the Divine Presence hovering over both
the Mishkan and the Beit haMikdash. We read:
‘Vayichas he’anan et ohel mo’ed uv’chabod Adonai male et haMishkan…’ – ‘And the cloud covered the Tent of Meeting and the Eternal’s glory filled the Tabernacle. And Moses was not able to come into the Tent of Meeting because the cloud had settled on it and the Eternal’s glory filled the Tabernacle. And when the cloud was lifted from on the Tabernacle, the children of Israel would travel… because the Eternal’s cloud was on the Tabernacle by day, and fire would be in it at night, before the eyes of all the house of Israel in all their travels.’ (Ex. 40:34-38).
Likewise, in the Book of Kings, we read:
‘When the priests came out of the sanctuary—for the cloud had filled the House of the Eternal and the pirests were not able to remain and perform the services because of the cloud, for the Presence of the Eternal filled the House of the Eternal—then Solomon declared:--Adonai amar lishkon ba’arfel: banoh banati beit zevul lach machon lishivt’cha olamim—The Eternal has chosen to abide in a thick cloud: I have now built for You a stately House, a place where You may dwell forever.’ (1 Kings 8:10-13).
It is the cloud – the Divine Presence – that provides us
with that bigger picture that grants us a justification of the seemingly
irrelevant minutiae, the droll descriptions of nuts and bolts, warp and weft,
linen and wool, copper, gold and silver. Maybe we need the detailed focus to
see the global perspective. Maybe we need the tangible and the material as the
vessel for the intangible, the fleeting, the transcendent. Maybe these parts of
the Torah teach us a great deal about the balancing of the material and
immaterial in our own lives. Perhaps there is a lesson in here the unhinged and
detached spirituality doesn’t work; that we need grounding in the nitty-gritty
of life, in the economy of the soul. Pekudei calls us to account, literally and
figuratively, on how we build spaces and rituals to receive what is good, true
and holy in our lives—not as disembodied principles but as a formidable
reality.
There’s a curious passage in the Talmud, Masechet Yoma 4b:
‘Rav Zerika raised the following contradiction: One verse reads, "And Moses was not able to enter into the tent of meeting because the cloud rested on it," whereas another verse (Ex. 24:18) says: "And Moses entered into the midst of the cloud"?‘
So, is the cloud a barrier to or an expression of Divine
intimacy? And does the world of ‘things’ hinder or help us in our connection to
the Eternal? Maybe the biggest picture of all is that it depends on the
intention we bring to the encounter. On how we make the seemingly irrelevant
relevant to our calling of living meaningful lives. If we are distracted by our
worldly possessions, we, like Moses, may not be able to enter the Ohel Mo’ed,
the Tent of Meeting. But if we sanctify and affirm the profundity of our
earthly existence, then the Divine Presence will enfold us like a cloud, guide
us like a pillar of fire and we will have full access to the depth and wisdom
of our tradition and our own conscience. Leviticus and this part of Exodus is
full of the drudgery of managing life: the Biblical equivalent of doing your
online banking, decluttering your attic, schlepping through the supermarket on
a Thursday evening, scrubbing the floor after yet another spill-up (can you
tell we live with a toddler?) and yet we do all these things because they aid
us in a life lived well: of feeding and sheltering the ones we love, of
cultivating our inner lives and engaging righteously with the world.
It seems
like a good place to start.
Comments
Post a Comment